Army Order 03 2001 Dgms Army ◎
Army Order 03/2001 (DGMS Army) is a critical regulatory document that outlines the revised policy and procedures for the medical examination and categorization
In military administrative terms, this is classified as Standing Order No. 03 of 2001 issued by the DGMS. army order 03 2001 dgms army
The order is frequently cited in Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) cases regarding disability pensions and wrongful discharge. For instance, it mandates that permanent low medical categories must be re-assessed every two years to ensure the individual's employability is correctly managed. Army Order 03/2001 (DGMS Army) is a critical
Army Order 03/2001 (AO 3/2001) is a primary policy document of the Indian Army that establishes instructions for the Medical Examination and Categorization Purpose: Define medical categories (e
- Purpose: Define medical categories (e.g., “A”, “SHAPE”, “P2(P)”, “LMC”/permanent low medical category), fitness standards, and procedures for constitution and reporting of medical boards, including Release Medical Boards (RMB).
- Medical category effect: Placement in a permanent low medical category (LMC) can disqualify personnel from promotion and extensions of service; it may trigger release/retirement as per policy.
- Reassessment cycle: Individuals in permanent medical categories are normally reassessed periodically (commonly every two years) and reassessment requires a duly constituted medical board; upgrades/downgrades follow board findings.
- RMB constraints: When a person is brought before a medical board specifically for release/retirement, Army Order 03/2001 provisions have been interpreted to mean the board’s role is to assess for release only and not to upgrade the existing permanent medical category unless specific criteria are met or another properly constituted board is held.
- Procedural safeguards: The order prescribes board composition, documentation, and medical evidence standards; decisions based on medical boards are expected to follow the order’s procedures and can be the subject of administrative/tribunal review if procedures are not followed or findings are irrational.