Gplus Polytrack Official

Revolutionizing Track Surfacing: Introducing GPlus Polytrack

compared to dirt tracks. The surface provides excellent shock absorption, reducing impact stress on a horse's legs. Predictable Performance: gplus polytrack

• Moisture monitoring: Too dry, and the wax becomes dusty and slick. Too wet, and it turns into a heavy, energy-sapping bog.
• Temperature tracking: On a 90°F day, the track crew may "fluff" the surface more to prevent compaction. On a 40°F day, they might roll it slightly to reduce kickback.
• The "Spring Reset": Each year, the top 4 inches must be screened, cleaned, and re-waxed. It costs upwards of $100,000 annually.

It requires no irrigation systems and is virtually dust-free, making it an environmentally friendly option for large-scale facilities. Global Usage Moisture monitoring: Too dry, and the wax becomes

| Surface Type | Characteristics | Pros | Cons | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | GPlus Polytrack | Wax-coated sand/fiber mix. | Excellent drainage, consistent, proven safety record. | Can be costly to maintain temperature regulation of wax. | | Tapeta | Sand, fiber, rubber, and wax (different formulation). | Often cited as having a slightly softer "feel" than Polytrack. | Similar maintenance costs; can be sensitive to specific maintenance machinery. | | Dirt | Sand, silt, clay. | Traditional surface, high speed, preferred in US Triple Crown. | Highly weather-dependent; high injury rates; kicks up "dirt" clods. | | Turf | Grass. | Natural, aesthetically pleasing. | Easily damaged by rain; requires It requires no irrigation systems and is virtually

The Safety Argument: Why Gplus Exists

The late 2000s saw a crisis in American racing: too many fatal breakdowns on conventional dirt (often due to "hard pan" surfaces or inconsistent cushion depth). Gplus Polytrack was a direct response.